Should Technology In Sports Be Limited? Answered!!!

We research and review everything that we share and recommend on our blog and try to keep things up to date. When you buy something through our links we may earn a commission. Learn more about our affiliate disclosure and about us.

Here is all you want to know about Should Technology In Sports Be Limited? No! The fast decline in injuries and the enhancement in injury detection times may be the two biggest advantages of technology in sports training. Monitoring performance, honing movements, and improving communication are not just advantages; they also contribute to developing surroundings that are less prone to damage.

Should Technology In Sports Be Limited?

Technology and data availability has increased exponentially in the present technological era across all industries, including sport. A potential downside should be considered despite the ease with which investing in and using new technologies might lead to complacency.

Before investing in technology, it is crucial to consider potential obstacles, such as its limitations and any contextual difficulties that could jeopardize its deployment in a particular setting. Therefore, careful consideration is required before selecting whether to put any particular technology into use.

Should Technology In Sports Be Limited 1

This article examines technological applications’ goals and potential hazards in sports science and medicine. We then provide a critical decision-making framework of 4 straightforward questions to assist practitioners in deciding whether to buy and use a particular technology.

Sports Technology: The Good And Bad

What has the connection between crows, dolphins, otters, mongooses, and octopuses? This is not the prelude to a crude joke, no. These individuals are the only members of the animal kingdom capable of using tools creatively apart from the great apes, the animal family to which humans belong.

The apparent justifications for participating in such a select group can be discussed later. Still, it is undeniable that animals have consistently discovered that manipulating objects with knowledge can increase their chances of getting what they desire.

Sports Technology The Good And Bad

The fundamental goal of all technologies is to reduce the amount of time, money, or effort required to produce one unit of output. The biggest technological advances in human history, from agriculture to metallurgy to industrialization to digital technologies like computing and the internet, all have this characteristic despite being very different in their applications.

Sports technology had a global market worth over $9 billion in 2018 and was projected to increase by another 20% in 2019. At the time of writing, Catapult, one of the most well-known companies in the industry, has a market value on the Australian Stock Exchange of more than $400 million. If you’ve ever worked for a major school or sports group, selecting a provider to collaborate with can cost upwards of six figures and include multi-year contracts.

The prevalence and impact of sports technology cannot be understated as the professionalization of sports at all levels continues. Athletes’ management systems, online programming platforms, and injury screening tools are examples of perspective solutions that coaches must frequently eliminate.

Too many coaches and teams approach the process blindly, wasting money and using technical square pegs in round holes despite the potential effects of these technologies on operational budgets, work habits, and ultimately the productivity of their personnel.

The benefits, downsides, and horror of sports technology will be examined in this essay to provide you with a decision-making filter for your next tech buy. I’m hoping it will help you avoid wasting a lot of time, money, and aggravation.

The Good

Gaining Time

Time-saving solutions are essential in the time-constrained field of strength and conditioning, where there is a natural desire to free oneself up to work on rather than in the system. This might be as easy as shortening the time needed to conduct routine tasks.

It may sound cliché, but even simple expenditures, such as more efficient cleaning techniques, can save many hours per person, per month. This is especially true in the coronavirus age.

Similar to outsourcing human jobs to digital tools, employment costs for routine everyday tasks can be significantly decreased. For example, an email or SMS reminder may replace the Google form, and a nudge to team members who don’t follow instructions are far superior to having a single intern ask the same questions at the end of each meeting.

The main objective should be to automate whenever it is feasible to do so without impairing human judgment. It is a straightforward choice to invest a little time now to save a lot of time later if the task has an optimal solution that can be reached without interpretation or decision-making.

Scripts for data collecting, processing, and visualization for programs like Excel, R, or Python are examples, especially for data sets where several hundred thousand data points are generated annually. Excel can help prepare, deliver, and modify code and prescribe training loads. But I think websites like Teambuildr, Train Heroic, and Bridge Athletic are easier to use and provide more integration and usefulness.

Gaining Money

As I’ve hinted in other writings, most issues in institutionalized sports are just financial issues. When an organization consistently loses money, pursuing a higher objective becomes extremely challenging and impossible. In contrast, having a surplus of money tends to make up for all other transgressions. It is a self-reinforcing loop that includes talent identification and recruiting, staff training and retention, marketing, and sponsorships.

Regarding physical preparation, salary and output lost due to injury are the biggest financial drain on professional sports teams. Every year, the most profitable sports leagues in the world spend millions of dollars on injured athletes. The causes of sports injuries are complex. Therefore there will inevitably be some injuries every year.

However, it is evident that soft tissue and non-contact injuries are fundamentally easier to manage than traumatic ones and that the balance between training stress and recovery is a significant risk factor. Managing injuries without specific load or stress response monitoring is akin, in my opinion, to operating a Ferrari with the dashboard covered. Although it is possible, it is not suggested!

Therefore, any device that can more precisely quantify training activity or the athlete’s reaction to such training provides insightful data. Accelerometry, GPS, and heart monitoring are frequently employed and well-validated technologies to evaluate the input side of this equation in field-based sports. The output side of the equation includes:

  • Hormone assays.
  • Heart rate variability cortical potential.
  • Neurological monitoring devices like Nordbord and GroinBar.

Be aware that no one method can serve as a panacea due to the complexity of both training load and the stress response. The best technology mix for you will rely on your sport, the issues you’re seeking to tackle, and your financial constraints.

However, investing $100,000 per year in sports technology can yield many times that amount in improved availability or more reliable or effective training when median weekly earnings surpass several hundred thousand dollars. Maintaining great players on the court or field with the hopes of winning a tournament or championship run can have multimillion-dollar repercussions, even in college athletics where labor is free.

Gaining Insight

The physical evaluation of athletes may, at its worst, be a waste of time. I am gathering facts to demonstrate something. The system functions. Could I please have my contract extended; Serves the coach instead of the player. You can call me cynical, but it should work! Testing frequently serves as a simple confirmation of what we already know intuitively as a result of training, putting away the politics of having to defend one’s existence to decision-makers.

We know where athletes stand about their peers, and it is rather simple to determine whether or not the programming is effective based on the training itself. (The weights are increasing in weight or moving more quickly!) It’s not the best use of a coach’s time to spend a whole day or week testing something you already know.

Similarly, expecting an athlete to “peak” for the testing day doesn’t line up with even the most accomplished coaches’ experience, and basing your program assessment on a single day of data is like trying to estimate the storyline of a book based on just one page.

The Bad

Increases Time

Despite how useful technology can be for improving athletic performance, we must never forget that it is there to simplify our lives. Bad technologies or poor applications miss this straightforward rule and add more work than they save.

The idea is that an existing employee who is overburdened will be responsible for overseeing GPS devices, even in professional teams (definitely in college and high school teams). The poor person ends up spending significantly more time in the system.

Similar to this, the value of GPS data depends on the coaching behavior and its influences. If a sports coach is unwilling to change practice loads, data and graphs are interesting but powerless.

It is important not to undervalue the political effort and time needed to ensure that important decision-makers comprehend such data, care about it, desire to use it, and have the technical skills necessary to see it through to completion. Ultimately, this scenario results in a net time expense with little actual gain.

To Conclude

Results are substantially improved by considering how we can use this equipment and these tools.  However, of their position within the sports hierarchy, these IT technologies quickly become a requirement for sports administrators. They significantly impact the profession as a whole and social inclusion in sports and leisure activities.

Rules are the foundation of sports, and by establishing the rules, we may decide which technology-enabled improvements are permitted. But regardless of whether it’s a piece of technology that makes it possible to run more quickly, which might be outlawed, or more systematic training based on genetics, we’re going to continue to get faster and stronger.

Because of the continually advancing technology that we have access to today, the usage of technology in sports should not be restricted. Hopefully, you understood the details regarding Should Technology In Sports Be Limited?

Frequently Asked Question

What are the benefits of sports technology?

It currently plays a crucial part in assisting athletes from various sports modalities to improve their performance during training and competitions. Smart devices have made tracking the status of matches simpler and more effective.

How does technology affect the future of sports?

Injury treatment and prevention will improve efficiency. Tech has a variety of methods to make sports safer. The development of smart protective gear and other wearable technology paves the way for quicker and more effective medical care by making it possible to monitor potentially catastrophic injuries better.

Is technology in sports cheating?

While technology has made legal advantages possible, like equipment, medical treatments, and nutrition, which have raised standards across sports, it has also made cheating more accessible.

What are the technology’s benefits and drawbacks for sports?

Enhanced training tools and information because more people are aware of food and sports supplements; athletes can benefit from strategies like carbo-loading and the ingredients in sports drinks. The disadvantages of technology for performance include an increase in injury risk due to lightweight equipment.

Similar Posts